A description of an authorship theory
Theoretical problems are here minimized even though they do exist.
Bloom , p. Lamarck had long been discredited among intellectuals by this time and evolutionary or development theories were exceedingly unpopular, except among the political radicals, materialists, and atheists - Chambers hoped to avoid Lamarck's fate. Lisboa: Moraes Editores, According to this view, there is obviously a rejection of the biographer's modus operandi, which attributes to the text the role of mirror of its author. He identifies four plot variations — classical, vengeance, transitional and professional — which appeared in that order. Therefore, what an author tells us about what he intended to say in his poem is understood by Eliot as an afterthought, which probably encompasses ideas taken into account at the time of writing, but which were given special relevance only when the work had already been completed. You've read about 30 pages and you are already beginning to fall in love with the story. But other arts can pose considerable problems for straightforward identification of authorship. In Compagnon, although the path taken by the theoretical tradition on the topic is of great value to this work, this path does not lead to a truly new vision about the author. In this seemingly absurd comparison, everything begins to make sense: the fact that Cervantes reappears identical three centuries later, i. Let us recall that, by writing poems in different styles and producing different sets of ideas, Fernando Pessoa chose to produce characters with biographies, i.
The cavalry does show up in the nick of time, remember. In poetry, what counts is the intellectual work on these emotions, in order to make them say something when transposed to another plane and where they are transformed.
They may be formally defined or simply cultural custom. Even Jean-Luc Godard marveled at the fact that he could attempt in his films simultaneously to demystify Hollywood cinema and in his viewing applaud John Wayne's charismatic stride across the screen.
One gets the uncomfortable sense in reading these Ford critics that the claim of great-poet status for him justifies avoiding real analysis or truly grappling with the Ford-text.
Hence in terms of the film's ideological project, Hatfield is a central character who must be eliminated. Captured in language, it is not the voice that is expressed, but the author only when he present at the time of utterance.
In his study of Husserl "Voice and Phenomenon", Derrida is the first to criticize the logocentrism of the meaning, i.
Order of authors in a list[ edit ] Rules for the order of multiple authors in a list have historically varied significantly between fields of research.
based on 55 review